Weird and Random (4)

I am not really sure how to rationally discredit this. It is possible that the assertions in this video are true. Prescott Bush did fund Hitler. That fact is scary enough alone, regardless of the claims in this video. But if these claims are authentic, so much of this stuff begins to make sense. Was he really funding Walt Disney? Keep in mind the secret societies that these people belong to. Scary but logical stuff. Just like videos of Osama bin Laden stopped surfacing when Obama became president. Fascinatingly enough, he was the president who killed Osama and dumped the body in the ocean. Powerful stuff, true or not, I am not laughing because it is possible.
In my next post, Weird and Random (5), the author looks into the King of Pop's death. Was he killed to prevent his impending acquisition and purchase of Walt Disney, the company?

Weird and Random (3)

What if the universe is actually an atom that we are experiencing from a different dimension? Steven Hawkings has briefly discussed this. Neil deGrasse Tyson has not dismissed this theory and quantum pysicsists are developing fo equations to theoretically prove this theory. So my question is, what if there was never a beginning? What if there have only ever been different stages of the evolutionary genome? Atoms are energy particles. The smallest we know of. A single atom is never destroyed but it can be transformed into a different representation of the same atom. Even if one were to cut an atom into a trillion pieces, each piece would still be an atom! What if the big bang was an atom fission? It is possible, just as dark energy is appearing to be not so mysterious after all, but rather just gravity from a different universe pulling at ours, while our own universe's gravity is the equal opposite force  giving matter an opportunity to exist in the first place. "Nothing" is everything existing simultaneously. 

Weird and Random (2)

After seeing this, there is no way Michael could have been guilty of anything associated with pedophilia. Unlike R. Kelly, there was nothing exploitative about Neverland. Michael didn't even charge the children or their parents to come. It was a massive free amusement park. Have you seen Michael's bed? The thing cannot even be called a bed. It is the size of two normal living rooms. He let a kid with cancer fall asleep in it. Bashir did a shameful job and he fucked us out of the presence of greatness. 

Weird and Random (1)

So I know this may sound like a strange question, but why is it so hard to get live video feed of Antarctica? I have no stomach for flat earth believers BUT, (and this is a HUGE BUT) What if earth is larger than we have been told? Is it unreasonable that, similar to the flat earth theory of the medieval era, this NASA earth we are fed is really horse crap? idk but I would love for NASA to show us some definitive live satellite footage of, not only the continent, but the circumference of the earth's longitute.

Admiral Byrd, in his Operation High Jump claimed there was a land beyond the South Pole, no eye had seen. He also made some other inctedible statements about his expeditions. NASA was created 1 year before his death and publicly denounced Byrd's claims. Who should we believe? The earth is getting hotter, the attic North Pole is Melting while the antartic South Pole Ice shelf expands. 

The Law of Opposites

I recently had dinner with a youth pastor of a local church the other day. His claim is that Christianity is the only religion that uses love to help others. I asked him if he had read the Qu'ran. He said no. I asked him if he had read the Hadith. He did not know what that was. I asked him if he had been to a Mosque, he said no. I then asked him if he had read the Book of Mormon, or the Talmud. The answer was the same. I told him that it is confusing to claim that one system of ideas is supremely exclusive to righteousness when, in reality, you know nothing about the traditions or faiths of others.

I am baffled at the notion humans have, that what they believe is exclusive to goodness. And yet we are largely ignorant of the experiences of others. Therefore it is impossible to qualify our ideas of goodness as the exclusive permission of God because our fears of the unknown have created the notion for God in the first place. If you need to believe that 2,600 years ago, God inseminated a virgin, the virgin had a child and the child was God in flesh, I am not here to call you foolish. The fact is that most people need to believe in authority to survive because they have no faith in themselves to make the tough decisions. It is the reason society organizes hierarchies of power. It is beyond foolish, however, to indicate that what you believe is the only way to achieve whatever it is you believe is established in the next life. There is a saying that says, "everything I am not makes me everything I am." This saying is a modern watered down version of the philosophic argument that the Law of Attraction is really the Law of Opposites. What propels two realities, often two people together, is what you cannot see, what you cannot experience or, in other words, what you do not know, because the past and the ideas of the future, and the unknown of what would have happened if you had made different decision, as well as the unknown of what may transpire in the future, is what guides you. It is the unseen force that moves you in one direction or the other. Therefore it is also consistent to suggest that what we don't know makes possible and is what motivates the desire to know; and though we may assign values to what we think we know, and call it knowledge, it is more accurate to call this knowledge an estimation. If we continue to extend this argument against exclusivity, we then must consider the plausibility that (the unseen world) what humans used to call angels and demons, are simply the electrons and protons of atomic energy. But what if these unseen atoms are actually universes, as quantum physics suggests? If we live on a planet in a solar system in a galaxy within a system of nuclear explosions called stars that, together, comprise a universe, then in reality, atoms are not merely atoms. (From a different perspective), we understand that, in reality and in perspective, the force of other universes establishes the reality of this present universe. You are looking for God to as the explanation for the things you do not know. But you are comprised of atoms. You, therefore, are a multitude of universes. Everywhere you look for God, you will find yourself. We do not know anything. We are estimating the value of everything. Even if we seek to experience everything and even if we were able to experience everything, there will always be that (what if) I had done something differently within that experience. It can be said that, from that perspective, the multitude of possibilities becomes an entire universe unto itself. 

If we understand existence then, in its proper context, we must inevitably ask the question, (why pursue) knowledge at all? If we are simply guessing (estimating) what is the point? My answer to this reasonable question is (Perspective). With greater perspective, the quality of life is fulfilled. If you believe in an afterlife then so too will the quality of that life be established. Different versions of you, the infinitaneous possibilities of your life experiences, are the principle reasoning behind the movement and existence of the stars. Heaven itself is yours, and so is Hell. That is why the ancient Pagan Schools of Philosophy would argue presently, that what we call the Law of attraction is, in reality, the Law of Opposites. The idea that something created everything is an inherently false premise. It is false because the ultimate evidence of truth is life. Nothing would live and breath were it not the principle definition of truth because nothing comes from nothing. If One supposes that God created everything, whatever created everything would have come from nothing. If atoms are neither created or destroyed as the Law (of Conservation of Mass) indicates, then that type of thinking is not possible for the development of life. There would be no consistency that has propounded into the chaotic goodness we call nature. This type of thinking that routes everything back to a single existence that, itself would be inconsistent with the estimated value we have assigned nature and, refuses to acknowledge or communicate righteousness with all of its creations that do not acknowledge it the way it wants to be acknowledged is entirely the creation of human imagination. My argument to support this assertion is (quite simply) Life. Life is the one common factor that humans can agree is a right to the individual human as well as to all other humans as well as all other things. Therefore, that which supports and promotes life is the ultimate truth. And if the quality of life is determined by the ability to ascertain information, to know, (or) estimate the value of, then perhaps eternal life has nothing to do with (good) deeds or whether your God is Jehovah, Allah or Jesus. Perhaps eternal life has to do with recognizing that the other people you experience in this life is you from a different perspective because ultimately the lives that come after you will be influenced by what you do and what you do not do in this life. If you have the right perspective, though there will always be the unknown, the things you do will be great.

Knowing Yourself and the Art of Knowledge

The obstacles that we encounter in life have less to do with malicious intentions as they do with initiations to deity. Knowing who you are does not lead to a title that gives you a label. Labels and titles take on different meanings with the advent of time. Who you are, is instead, an understanding of your Purpose in this life, as it relates to the Potential in influencing the lives of others. For those who are unaware of the true definition of spirit, it would behoove you to cease quoting scripture until you are knowledgeable. For those who do not know the meaning or definition of soul, please learn these meanings so that when you speak of such matters they will not betray ignorance.

The Spirit is the Potential of an idea. Ideas are the initial seed of philosophy. How you choose to develop this personal philosophy then becomes your ultimate Purpose in life, upon which all other experiences in life must depend. It is up to you to develop this philosophy and make it consistent for the multiplication of good in others. It is this Purpose which becomes the highest calling any human can ever possess. It is therefore the purest definition of Soul. The definition of philosophy is the science of estimating values and as such, it is the pattern of thought that systems of life are built upon. If you do not possess your own philosophy and do not live according to it you are then living out someone Else's ideas and are therefore possessed by those Spirits which govern this society.

This is the true art of spirit possession. It has nothing to do with conjuring up demons from the darkness. Most people that you encounter, especially the religious faithful, question nothing that has a symbol of authority behind it. Just so we understand how far away from the dignity of humanity that this can take us, we are talking about people who worship Jesus but support the invasions, destruction and massacres of people that live in the same region Jesus came from. We are talking about people who, over 85% support the death penalty, even though statistics are being released every day that show many people on death row do not even belong there. It is they, above all, who are possessed by the Spirits of this world, regardless of what they say or the bible verses they quote and It is the true meaning of the biblical Legion.

But this is what happens when you believe that your way is the only way. You have no problems surrendering others to destruction, and this alone spites their self described identity as an advocate for the salvation of others. I see too often the following described in social media: "I will not hurt you but when your time comes I will be in the front row eating popcorn." as it were. Shame on you people who think in such a way, for surely in your not too distant past you were the antagonist of an epic that brought out the lesser of human virtues in the lives of others. Religion has to do with keeping people ignorant of their own deity and making them so afraid to suggest that they are a deity that they surrender and stop seeking their own path. Religion demonizes the path of self-hood. God is in heaven but heaven is the quality of your mind. Therefore, God is within you and he is you. Your mind is heaven and it is hell. How you choose to develop your mind towards knowledge of self is what defines its goodness or evil.

"The fool has said in his heart there is no god". - Psalm 14:1 Many people will read this and misunderstand and believe that the fool is an ignoramus. That is only because they do not know the rest of the conversation: "But I say to you, you are all gods."- Psalm 82:6. The fathers of Christianity despised philosophy so badly that they called philosophers fools and began forcing many students of the philosophic schools they sacked to perform as court jesters. To be called a biblical fool only happens out of ignorance of the legacy of philosophy. It is not possible to love your neighbor when you inherently believe that you are superior to him. If you believe that your neighbor is an enemy of God simply because he refuses your faith or religion, it is not possible to see him as an equal and therefore it is not possible to love him. It is the intolerance of religion that sows evil in the world for there is little else more inconsistent in a system of values beyond intolerance.

A man who understands that his Potential is without limit and that his true Purpose depends on his development of his own philosophy for the multiplication of good in others, such a man is not possessed by the Spirits which govern this world. He is instead possessed by the stars and the galactic powers which bind them across the universe. To know yourself is the greatest journey anyone can undertake. And that is why one of the greatest schools of philosophy ever known by western civilization, the Temple of Apollo had inscribed at its doors in Delphi, "gnothi seauton" (Man, know thyself and thou wilt know the gods).

Spherical vs. Linear Logic

Is spherical reason a fallacy? The idea that it is was originally promulgated by the Catholic church in the 11th century. Coincidentally, scientific discovery became replaced with superstition and witchcraft and all of Europe was veiled in plague, famine, and ignorance. Previously however, spherical reasoning discovered the atom in 400 BC. It transmuted metals for the better half of human history. It led to advancements in medicine and divined the pattern of constellations. It aided the farmers and harvests of agrarian society. It warned against the concentration of wealth.

It is possible that the notion of spherical logic being a pervasive fallacy is itself a fallacy. For if we are to examine the greatest philosophical subject known to man we are summoned to the subject of God. Linear logic cannot prove the existence of God. For if, in the spirit of the alternative- linear logic, one seeks to prove the existence of God, the question will always remain what, or who, created God. And if you believe that God created himself through himself, you have in essence, rather shrewdly accepted the validity of spherical logic. In which case, it teaches us that there is no beginning and no end. But rather a continuum of transitory periods from one state to the next. Humans never really see themselves. They see an apparition of themselves through reflection, but even the reflection is not accurate for it is marred by delays in the fabric of space time. The reflection itself is therefore inaccurate. Linear logic is therefore incapable of proving perhaps even the basic and essential truth of man's existence which is the human himself. 

The accepted idiom of individual existence happens not to be in the spirit of linear, but rather spherical logic. The phrase coined by Sir Francis Bacon; "I think, therefore I am," is circular, or spherical logic. One cannot prove the existence of thought through physical evidence alone. But that does not mean it is unreal. Is thought, itself therefore spiritual? Is thought itself, therefore God? 

Not that God does not exist but rather that both our perception and perspective of God have been shrouded in linear hierarchical misogyny. For if the body of nature is spherical, the earth, the sun, the milky way and the universe, how is the advancement of humanity served by thinking only linearly? Such a travesty is tantamount to flat earth theory and is, in fact, no different. If God is your creator, who created God? Did God create himself? And if so, what did he create himself with? For whatever was used to create God, would therefore, be eternal and ever lasting and not God. 

Perhaps, however, the answer to this pervading question is only a question that can be answered through what we have been taught, rather erroneously, is fallacious thinking, and that is the proposals brought forth through spherical and not linear logic. That "nothing", or oblivion, only exists as a different state of matter. For if matter is neither created nor destroyed, perhaps the idea of nothing is merely everything existing as 1 universal order inseparable through space or time. Such a phenomenon would mean that, in a different state of matter that we call the beginning, all atoms were fused together to create a nuclear bonding so magnificent, that even light itself could not perceive itself. In the sacred book of Genesis this is called the great void. We call it gravity. Such an ordeal would suggest that "nothing", is in reality a state of matter, similar to, if not of the same punctuality, of a black hole. The beginning of human perception may begin here, but it cannot be said that the universe has a beginning or an end. Such a proposition disproves the very God the religious elect attempt to prove. Matter never ends, nor does it begin, it simply transitions from different states of existence. And therefore it is not spherical logic that is the fallacy, but rather the stagnation of human thought brought about through the obtrusiveness of linear logic alone. THINK about it.