Spherical vs. Linear Logic

Is spherical reason a fallacy? The idea that it is was originally promulgated by the Catholic church in the 11th century. Coincidentally, scientific discovery became replaced with superstition and witchcraft and all of Europe was veiled in plague, famine, and ignorance. Previously however, spherical reasoning discovered the atom in 400 BC. It transmuted metals for the better half of human history. It led to advancements in medicine and divined the pattern of constellations. It aided the farmers and harvests of agrarian society. It warned against the concentration of wealth.

It is possible that the notion of spherical logic being a pervasive fallacy is itself a fallacy. For if we are to examine the greatest philosophical subject known to man we are summoned to the subject of God. Linear logic cannot prove the existence of God. For if, in the spirit of the alternative- linear logic, one seeks to prove the existence of God, the question will always remain what, or who, created God. And if you believe that God created himself through himself, you have in essence, rather shrewdly accepted the validity of spherical logic. In which case, it teaches us that there is no beginning and no end. But rather a continuum of transitory periods from one state to the next. Humans never really see themselves. They see an apparition of themselves through reflection, but even the reflection is not accurate for it is marred by delays in the fabric of space time. The reflection itself is therefore inaccurate. Linear logic is therefore incapable of proving perhaps even the basic and essential truth of man's existence which is the human himself. 

The accepted idiom of individual existence happens not to be in the spirit of linear, but rather spherical logic. The phrase coined by Sir Francis Bacon; "I think, therefore I am," is circular, or spherical logic. One cannot prove the existence of thought through physical evidence alone. But that does not mean it is unreal. Is thought, itself therefore spiritual? Is thought itself, therefore God? 

Not that God does not exist but rather that both our perception and perspective of God have been shrouded in linear hierarchical misogyny. For if the body of nature is spherical, the earth, the sun, the milky way and the universe, how is the advancement of humanity served by thinking only linearly? Such a travesty is tantamount to flat earth theory and is, in fact, no different. If God is your creator, who created God? Did God create himself? And if so, what did he create himself with? For whatever was used to create God, would therefore, be eternal and ever lasting and not God. 

Perhaps, however, the answer to this pervading question is only a question that can be answered through what we have been taught, rather erroneously, is fallacious thinking, and that is the proposals brought forth through spherical and not linear logic. That "nothing", or oblivion, only exists as a different state of matter. For if matter is neither created nor destroyed, perhaps the idea of nothing is merely everything existing as 1 universal order inseparable through space or time. Such a phenomenon would mean that, in a different state of matter that we call the beginning, all atoms were fused together to create a nuclear bonding so magnificent, that even light itself could not perceive itself. In the sacred book of Genesis this is called the great void. We call it gravity. Such an ordeal would suggest that "nothing", is in reality a state of matter, similar to, if not of the same punctuality, of a black hole. The beginning of human perception may begin here, but it cannot be said that the universe has a beginning or an end. Such a proposition disproves the very God the religious elect attempt to prove. Matter never ends, nor does it begin, it simply transitions from different states of existence. And therefore it is not spherical logic that is the fallacy, but rather the stagnation of human thought brought about through the obtrusiveness of linear logic alone. THINK about it.